Chloe Williams and Andy Campbell are members of Saint Augustine’s Music, a collective of songwriters, musicians, theologians, and creatives based in Auckland. Here they talk about collaborative process, about God’s work in and through their music, and about their latest EP Death Is Not The End. You can find the music on Spotify and Apple music, along with some visually stunning lyric videos on YouTube—Ed.
It’s great to get the time with you both—thank you. I’d love to begin by hearing more about Saint Augustine’s music. Tell us about where it’s from, who you guys are, and how it began.
Chloe: So, we are part of Saint Augustine’s Church, which is an Anglican church that meets in Auckland. We are basically a crew of song writers and worship leaders with a heart for the local Church. We’ve got people with more of a musical background, some with a bit more of the writing background, and we’ve got a theologian in the mix. We have been writing for a while. Andy and I go back to when I was 21, when I joined St Paul’s [Symonds St] and quickly joined the worship team there. My husband Isaac, who’s also in the Saint Augustine’s music crew, is like best friends forever with Andy and with Chris Cope from Saint Paul’s, and they did a lot of writing together. We were part of Worship Central, which was writing with a whole bunch of people from different churches across New Zealand, Aotearoa. So the writing relationships actually go back a long time. My husband and I had been out of the country for five years, and we came back and got involved here at Saint Augustine’s. Then we just gathered and sought to intentionally write together again—and brought in a few new faces. Our first offering was throughout COVID. We didn’t actually plan to record—it didn’t feel overly strategic, eh.
Andy: Nah, it was literally: We’ve been in lockdown and apart; let’s get in the room and hit record. It was never actually to release an EP digitally—it was always to make some videos that we could use in our Sunday online gatherings.
Chloe: So, a happy byproduct was the fact that we suddenly had these songs that we loved. And so we thought: Oh, let’s kind of massage them a bit to get the quality up to a standard that we’re happy with. We engaged a producer friend in Brisbane, Brett Shaw, who we knew from Worship Central AU/NZ and he just brought them to life. That EP was called A Table, and it features the songs “You Are Good”, “As I am Still”, “To Be Like You”, and “Here and Now”.
Andy: We’re a collective of creatives really, trying to encourage each other in our own craft, as well as in the work we do together with songwriting and making music.
What’s your process? How do you work?
Chloe: Sometimes creative people need a deadline or some sort of reason to do something. In the case of the song “Evergreen”, we had a season of trying to memorize Psalm 1 as a church. And so, we just thought, Oh, let’s use this as opportunity to write something—that’s where that song came from. With the new song “Shalom”, we had a season of writing poetry together. There was a particular exercise centred on the theme of justice: we went off individually and then came back together—Andy came up with the initial idea for that song. So, there is often a seed of an idea to begin, and then we go to the group for feedback, and then either go back and work on our own again or we bring in more writers into the editing phase of the song. It’s this constant to and froing, I guess; but it is essentially Andy and I coming up with those beginning ideas.
Writers are notoriously precious about what they draft—and I wonder if it can be hard for a writer of worship songs to edit what they’ve come up with, partly because it’s threaded through with conviction, right? I’m interested, too, that you have a theologian in the mix. What’s the editing conversation like? How does that work?
Andy: I mean, we like to think about ourselves as theologians as well! Jon Hoskin is the person you’re referring to. He has been an absolute gift. He comes from an art-making background himself (poetry) and then has loaded into that whole lot of theological depth through his PhD. Many theologians are just out and out theologians: that’s their thing. So, to have someone like Jon who has a real appreciation for aesthetics and the experience—there’s a gift. Yeah, and he just asks the right questions, like: Is there more there? Or, Is that really saying what we need it to say? Sometimes they’re really annoying questions, because you’ve worked hard at something, and you’re like, Okay, this feels 99% for me. And he’s saying: We’re still at 60%!
If there was one word to sum up our process it’s: rewrite, rewrite, rewrite. And we have become more comfortable with that, I think. Every now and then a song will come—“Evergreen” came in kind of one hit, all very quickly. I’ve had one or two songs over my song writing journey that have come like that, where to rewrite feels more like tampering with it than enhancing it; there’s a purity that you don’t really want to mess with. But for the most part I think there’s a wisdom in being open to receiving feedback before you release it, particularly when you’re writing for the worship context, to put words in other people’s mouths.
Chloe: I’ve also noticed with writing worship songs particularly it makes you check your theology all of the time. You’re like: Do I really believe that? When you’re writing there’s that initial spark of an idea that feels really fresh; and then you just start to regurgitate all these things you’ve said a million times. And then that suddenly doesn’t feel fresh anymore, or reveals some weird theology that’s lurking in your subconscious! So I think it’s actually just really healthy to be writing with friends that you trust and that have a high, high value on good theology, because the stakes are so high. I mean, it doesn’t really matter what the streaming stats are; even if we’re only going to sing it in our context, the stakes are high.
Andy: Yeah, you’re forming people’s imaginations in that worship context. I think one of the things that Chloe brings as well, which is awesome, is a real desire and discipline to keep songs single-minded. It’s quite easy for the first verse to be single minded, but then you’ve got to write a second verse and it’s like, “Oh, I’ve exhausted my understanding of that idea—let’s just chuck in something a bit random but which kind of rhymes….” Having someone with fresh ears and fresh eyes on something is a real gift. You know, I live with a lot of my songs for a long time, and you do lose perspective. I need to bring it to the group to go: Am I just wasting my time here?