Ok, sure—maybe I added a couple of details to the description of the guy in Luke’s gospel. But don’t you think the name Zacchaeus gives off a cartoony vibe? Like: mean short guy in a stripey gown up a sycamore, with a white-robed, red-sashed Jesus heading his way. As I said, Zacchaeus is on my mind. But this is not because I’m hanging out for a re-run of the Sunday School flannelgraph rendition of Luke 19. When the good doctor recounted the story of Zacchaeus and Jesus, I’m sure he wasn’t thinking, “This will be a great one for the kids”. Despite the situational comedy of crowds and tree-climbing, Luke’s narrative is getting at something significant. So often, the gospel stories invite us to identify with one or other of the characters in a given narrative. Here, we find ourselves confronted with a two-character drama of Zacchaeus and Jesus—and it’s pretty clear which part we’re invited to identify with. Much as I’d like to hold the treed tax-collector at arm’s length and laugh at him, I’ve not only been finding that Zacchaeus is on my mind, but that his troubled life is speaking to mine.
Twelve years ago, I found myself stuck. Not stuck up a sycamore but stuck in life—and profoundly so. Several years earlier, I’d set out to pursue an academic career, commencing on a PhD. Equipped with a generous scholarship, we shipped off to Scotland for three very good years. I returned with a well-minted thesis (soon to be a book), and began pitching for a permanent position, fired by self-belief and not a little naive optimism. Nearly three years on, as the wake of the global financial crisis widened, I found myself routinely working three adjunct positions simultaneously, and across two or three institutions. I was on ambition’s ladder and climbing, but somehow there were always more rungs (or did I keep slipping?), and at some point I found I couldn’t lift my arms. I was deeply stuck: stoical, anxious, and uncharacteristically angry. Cycling home one day, feeling the cars (too close!) push by me, leaving me behind, I was flooded with fear and rage. With a weird detachment, I noticed myself saying The Lord’s Prayer over out loud as a way of keeping back the profanities that were rising like vomit in my mouth.
It was an acute moment in an important failure. Like many studious, ambitious people, I had become quietly self-focussed, secretly entitled, critical and anxious. Mercifully, the experience helped me to acknowledge that I was stuck. The longer telling of this story concerns one of the more excruxiating relinquishments and griefs I’ve tasted so far: I gave up the ambition of becoming a tenured academic, and slowly, by strange and God-given turns, I fell more truly into step with Providence. More immediately however, my moment of road-rage received an answer (or, perhaps, a rebuke) in the form of a magazine article that a friend happened to mention. In that article, a theologian reflected on her experience of silent, submissive prayer. I know: not a catchy name. Nevertheless, I was brought up short by the theologian’s reflection that this way of praying—this simple way of keeping company with God—not only changed how she felt about her life and her work, but changed her life and her work full stop, engendering a profound change of heart and mind. Desperate as I was, I decided to call her bluff. I locked myself in to my university office, pulled the curtains, and got down on my knees in the centre of the room.
Nothing happened. Or at least, nothing happened in the terms set by my ambition: there was no “answer” to my situation, no prospective employer’s knock at the door, no sudden email notification in response to one of the many job applications I had floating out in the ether. It was all spectacularly unsuccessful. I was a desperate man who, in sadness and difficulty, surrounded by the flotsam of my success and effort, had gone out of his way to adopt a classically desperate posture, kneeling on the carpet tiles, for ten minutes or so, in hopeless silence. Even so, I was strangely comforted. Perhaps because my pain at life was so present, most potential distractions held little power, and a great, simple stillness settled over me. Something about the posture—becoming small, kneeling down, becoming inactive, not being powerful—was commensurate with my situation in general. Insofar as it was a way of praying that fitted the realities of my life, I was at last being honest. In a sense, with my body, I was saying to God: “Here I am, a sad and helpless man.” And so—as is always the case when we are willingly honest—to pray like this was good, and therefore comforting.
If that had been all that there was to it, I don’t think I would have stuck at it for more than a week. But there was more going on in this way of praying than feeling comforted. Something deeper was stirring, a kind of appetite. Throughout the rest of the day, as I wrote and researched, taught and talked, I found my mind wandering to those ten minutes of after-lunch silence keeping company with God. Despite a steep learning curve in the classic challenges of silent, listening prayer—distractions, daydreaming, inner fears and preoccupations—my longing to be with God only grew, to let my helplessness take shape before him. Ten minutes extended, became twenty, or longer. It became a space where I sought God on his terms, not holding out for my wishes, or shrinking back in my fear. Nothing in my outward situation changed immediately. The more important change was happening in secret. I was learning just how good, how deeply comforting, and how profoundly enabling, keeping company each day with God can be.
There’s much in Luke’s story of Zacchaeus that remains tantalisingly unexplained. As is typical of ancient texts, we’re not told of Zacchaeus’s state of mind, or exactly what life circumstance set him on a collision course with Jesus. We’re only told that “he was a chief tax collector and was wealthy”. None of that directly explains why he was so desperate to get a view of Jesus, though the story’s remarkable conclusion suggests Zacchaeus’s arboreal adventure did ultimately have something to do with his line of work. Somewhere at the centre of Zacchaeus’s life was not God but a nexus of money, power, and violence, and the fear that so readily plays host to these. There’s something sad, dirty, and desperate about him. All we’re told directly is: “He wanted to see who Jesus was” (Luke 19:3). For reasons he himself does not understand, Zacchaeus is drawn to this rabbi. Perhaps, there’s something self-seeking in his tree climbing: maybe he wants to see Jesus without the risk of being seen, without the danger that his wealthy life might be opened up to God’s power. But maybe Zacchaeus is already desperate enough to risk this: maybe climbing the tree is a deliberate act of humbling himself. Either way, he goes out of his way to see Jesus. He goes out of his own way, and thus, as is often the way of things, he strays into the path of God.